Should You Cut That Service Line? A CPA's Test Before You Kill It
Agencies that narrow their services grow faster, but only when they cut the right line. A CPA's four-question test before you shut one down.
6 min read
Craig Cody October 16, 2026
By Craig S. Cody, CPA, Certified Tax Coach.
Most agencies carry at least one service line that's quietly eating their margin, and the owner usually suspects which one. What stops the cut isn't strategy. It's that nobody has shown them what the line actually earns once you count the senior time that never hits a timesheet, and which costs would really leave if it went away.
I've watched clients keep service lines alive that should have been shut down years earlier. When they finally made the call, their margins went up. Every time.
Here's the test I'd run before you cut, so you pick the right line and the cut does what you want it to.
Campaign US recently asked agency leaders how they decide to shut down services that no longer serve them. Brian Kessman, founder of Lodestar Agency Consulting, put the case plainly: many agencies think a narrow focus shrinks their market, when it actually expands it.
The numbers back him up. Promethean Research's State of Digital Services 2026, a survey of 119 agency leaders on their 2025 results, found:
That's a strong signal, with one caution. A survey tells you that the agencies that cut did well. It doesn't tell you which lines they cut, or how. The agency that cuts the wrong line, or cuts the right one badly, isn't in that 13%. That's the part a CPA can help with.
Because the P&L is organized by type of expense, not by service. Salaries, rent and software are each one line. Nothing on it says "paid social cost us this much to deliver."
So owners judge each service by the margin they can see: what the client pays, minus the hours people booked to it. On that view, almost every line looks fine. We've written before about how a blended margin hides lines that don't match, and about running margin by account manager. The shutdown decision needs two more things on top of that.
It's the hours you and your most senior people spend propping up a line without ever logging them. The owner who joins every escalation call. The creative director who rewrites the deliverable at 9pm. The strategist who keeps a struggling client from leaving.
None of that shows up in the line's booked margin, because nobody books it. But it's real payroll, and it's usually the most expensive payroll you have.
Here's an example. Say an agency runs $2.4 million of agency gross income (AGI, revenue after pass-through costs like media) across three lines:
| Brand and creative | PR | Paid social | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGI | $1,200,000 | $800,000 | $400,000 |
| Booked delivery cost | $480,000 | $360,000 | $200,000 |
| Booked margin | 60% | 55% | 50% |
Paid social at 50% doesn't look like a problem. Now add the senior time. The owner's fully loaded pay is $300,000, and about a quarter of it goes to paid social fires. A senior strategist costs $160,000, and about 30% of their time goes to the same place. That's $123,000 of real cost the booked view never sees.
| Brand and creative | PR | Paid social | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booked cost plus senior time | $664,000 | $513,000 | $323,000 |
| Real margin | 45% | 36% | 19% |
Now the line that looked fine is plainly the weakest one in the building. That's usually the moment an owner who's been stalling sees it.
This is the test most owners skip, and it's the one that decides whether the cut raises your margin.
When you shut a line down, some costs walk out the door with it and some stay. In the example:
So paid social isn't just a 19% line. It's also bringing in $200,000 more than the costs that leave with it ($400,000 of AGI, minus $200,000). Take it away and that $200,000 has to come from somewhere.
Here's the agency's whole year three ways, with $500,000 of overhead that doesn't change:
| Keep paid social | Cut it, change nothing else | Cut it and redeploy the senior time | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGI | $2,400,000 | $2,000,000 | $2,350,000 |
| Booked delivery cost | $1,040,000 | $840,000 | $940,000 |
| Owner and strategist | $460,000 | $460,000 | $460,000 |
| Overhead | $500,000 | $500,000 | $500,000 |
| Profit | $400,000 (16.7%) | $200,000 (10.0%) | $450,000 (19.1%) |
In the third column, the owner's and the strategist's freed-up time goes into brand and creative, the line clients pay the most for. That supports $350,000 of new creative work for $100,000 of added delivery cost, with no new senior hire. Profit goes up, and so does the margin.
The middle column is the warning. Cut the line, keep the same people doing less, and profit halves. The line wasn't the problem in that column. The plan was.
Run it through four questions:
If the line fails the first question and you can answer the third, that's a line that should have been discontinued. That's the kind I've watched clients finally cut, and why their margins went up.
The tax side won't decide whether to cut, but it affects what the cut costs you. Three things to plan before you announce it:
The year you cut a line often has lower profit, which means your deductions are worth less that year. That's why we put the wind-down into the year-end projection before the announcement, not after.
If your agency has one service, you've already done this. If a line is new and still being built, judge it by where it's headed, not by this year's margin. And if the weak line is weak because of one bad client, fix or fire the client before you shut down the service.
This is for marketing and PR agency owners carrying three or more services, who've had a nagging feeling about one of them for more than a year.
When its real margin, with the senior time it eats counted in, is well below your other lines, and you can name where the freed time and money will go. If you can't name that second part, the cut may lower your profit.
It's the unlogged hours that the owner and senior staff spend propping up a service: escalation calls, late-night rewrites, saving at-risk clients. It's real payroll that never shows up in the line's booked margin.
No. It raises profit when the costs that leave with the line, plus what the freed senior time earns elsewhere, outweigh the AGI you give up. Cut a line and keep everyone doing less, and profit can fall.
In Promethean Research's 2026 survey of 119 agency leaders, agencies that reduced services grew 13% in 2025, versus 9.8% for those that expanded and 5.7% for those that held steady. The survey doesn't say which lines they cut.
Often, yes. Severance is deductible, and its timing decides which year. Assets you abandon may produce a deduction for their remaining tax value. Goodwill from an acquired line follows special rules and often can't be deducted when the line closes.
Kessman is right that focus can grow an agency. But focus pays off when you cut the right line and have a plan for what it frees up. Add the senior time, list what actually leaves, and name where the freed capacity goes. Then make the call you've probably been putting off.
I also wrote a book for agency owners. You can request a free copy at the link below.
Nobody's looking out for your money but you. Let's talk.
Craig S. Cody is a CPA, Certified Tax Coach, and retired NYPD Lieutenant. His firm works with more than 70 marketing and advertising agency owners every month, helping them keep more of what they make through proactive tax planning.
This article is general education, not advice for your specific situation. Confirm your own facts with your advisor before acting.
Agencies that narrow their services grow faster, but only when they cut the right line. A CPA's four-question test before you shut one down.
Agencies that track profit project by project are the most profitable. Here's the one-page project P&L your delivery lead should own.
A forecast built on projects starts with a guess. One built on retainers starts with signed agreements. Why that makes agency money easier to manage.